Marcello De Cecco Prize 2025
EUI Second-Year Best Paper Award 2024
Presented at: EHS Annual Meeting 2025 (Glasgow)*; Workshop in Economic History 2025 (Uppsala)*; EAYE Annual Meeting 2025 (London); Naples PhD and Post-Doc Workshop 2025 (Naples); EUI Micro-Econometrics Working Group 2025; Mani Visibili: Giornate di Economia Marcello De Cecco 2025 (Lanciano); AYEW Cultural/Economic History Workshop 2025 (Online)
*poster session
[La Fonte Blog] [Corriere della Sera] [EUI Award] [Marcello de Cecco Prize]
Charismatic leadership can facilitate nation-building by transforming policy promises into widely shared expectations. But by elevating reference points, charisma may also amplify disappointment when institutional delivery falls short. I study Giuseppe Garibaldi’s 1860 expedition in Southern Italy and exploit a plausibly quasi-random break in exposure caused by the unexpected halt of his march at Teano. I reconstruct Garibaldi’s intended advance by linking unavoidable strategic targets using historical sources and a least-cost path based on roads and terrain. I then compare municipali ties Garibaldi visited to otherwise similar municipalities he was on track to reach but did not, using overlap weights to balance geography, pre-campaign development, and proximity to the reconstructed route. Garibaldi’s visits initially consolidated the new Kingdom of Italy: visited municipalities were less likely to experience post-unitary brig andage. Yet in the long run, these places disengaged from the national project: turnout was lower in 1913, the first election with universal male suffrage. Evidence points to an expectations channel. Garibaldi’s rhetoric is more collective than the King’s; naming choices display a post-1860 surge and mid-1860s reversal in “Giuseppe”; and effects concentrate where Garibaldi’s “cheap-bread” pledge had higher local material stakes. The results show how charismatic promise-making can unify in the short run yet erode civic engagement when delivery falls short.
Working paper available soon!
Presented at: Growth, History and Development Annual Workshop 2025 (Odense)
How do mass media shape gender norms? This paper studies the expansion of local newspapers in Victorian and Edwardian Britain and their impact on women’s labor supply, marriage, fertility, and political mobilization. We link data on the staggered arrival of newspapers across 620 districts to census microdata, petition records, and newspaper text. Using a dynamic difference-in-differences design, we find that, on average, newspaper access reinforced traditional gender roles: female labor force participation declined, marriage accelerated, and fertility rose. Yet these patterns reversed in districts exposed to a major feminist shock—the 1866 suffrage petition for women's suffrage. In these areas, newspapers increased women’s labor market participation, delayed marriage, and reduced fertility. Effects were strongest in places with lower baseline female empowerment. Text analysis reveals that positive framing of the petition independently boosted female labor supply. Moreover, exposure to favorable coverage of the 1866 petition increased local petitioning rates for female political emancipation, suggesting media shaped not only beliefs but collective action. These results show that newspapers acted not just as information sources, but as coordination technologies—amplifying or stalling change depending on timing, content, and narrative salience. Symbolic inclusion can shift social equilibria—but the emancipatory power of media depends on who is visible, when, and how.
Can gender roles and gender equality explain the incidence and brutality of armed conflicts? While qualitative studies have long recognized the impact of unequal gender roles on violence, no empirical study has already explored this relationship. Feminist scholars in international relations have recently made a stand to affirm how the juxtaposition of privileged masculinity and “devalorized” femininity can contribute to explaining the patterns of violence. Indeed, as the sociologist Johan Galtung explains, the mutual relationship between structural and cultural violence helps in understanding how gender-related inequalities can become inescapable rationalizations of war-initiation. This essay aims at quantitatively investigating whether the intra-regional level of gender equality has an impact on the occurrence of internal conflicts and the number of battle-related deaths. I collect fine-grained geographical data on conflict and gender norms from 29 countries of continental Africa. Results indicate that higher gender equality leads to less brutal (but not fewer) conflicts. To establish causality, I exploit the distance to the closest water spring as an instrument for gender roles, by relying on Ester Boserup’s theory of the role of women in human development. Indeed, collecting water is a traditionally female occupation and women have been used to carry heavy loads over long and winding routes, taking away valuable time from income-generating jobs and education. IV estimates confirm that improvements in gender equality reduce the brutality but not the incidence of conflicts: a 1 standard deviation increase in gender equality results in 0.21 s.d. less fatalities in conflicts.